An
observation frequently made by historians is that generals are always preparing
to fight the last war they fought in.
The next war when it comes, however, is never like the war that went
before. As a Church, we are often
planning and preparing to minister to the society of the past rather than the
one that is to come. As a Church, we
need to leave behind the preoccupations of the past and look to the future. In a fast-changing world, it simply cannot be
‘business as usual’.
So, what
about our ministry to today’s generation?
Millennials, that is, those born between 1981 and 1996 get a bad
press. But it is to this generation that
the task of wrestling with the changes and challenges facing us all is going to
fall.
What,
Synod, do we have to say to them?
Let me make
it more personal. What do we have to say
to the Girl with the Tattoo having coffee in Starbucks. Let’s call her Milly.
Milly is in
her twenties. She is bright,
well-educated, with a professional career.
She isn’t married, and has no intention of having children any time
soon. She does have a boyfriend, who, of
course, she has sex with regularly. She
wouldn’t understand why anyone would have a problem with that. Just as she doesn’t understand why I still
get excited about ‘skyping’ with family and friends.
Now you may
be thinking that Milly is western and that perhaps the Starbucks is in New York
or London. But no, we are in Festival
Walk, and Milly is Chinese. She went to
Heep Yunn – or was it DGS? She does not
go to Church, and has no interest in going.
What,
Synod, do we have to offer Milly that may make her interested in going?
It is no
good telling her how we are ‘for the City’ or how we run schools and welfare
agencies. That’s all very nice, but it
is unlikely to interest her. After all,
if we didn’t, others would. They already
do. Please don’t misunderstand me. These are all important, but what makes us
different? What can we offer Milly that
she can’t get elsewhere?
I was ordained
the year that the first millennial was born.
During my ministry, the Church has striven to be relevant. It still does. This desire to be seen as relevant, however,
hasn’t attracted people to our Churches.
Quite the reverse. And the quest
for relevance has been at the cost of our message. We have failed to see the difference between
speaking in a way that is relevant and changing our message in the hope of
making it seem relevant. The desire for
relevance has been at the cost of who we are.
In our desire to be relevant, we have sacrificed being authentic. The terrible irony is that millennials like
Milly are more likely to be attracted by authenticity than they are by an
institution that changes its message in the hope of gaining popularity.
Now I am
not suggesting that we should be authentic to be relevant! We will, however, never be relevant unless we
ourselves are authentic with a message that is authentic – whether people
believe in it or not, like it or not, or are attracted to it or not.
And what
could be more authentic than God, the One ‘in whom we live and move and have
our being’? Surely, we in the Church
should be able to offer Milly God? But
can we?
Next:
Part Three:
We are All Atheists Now
No comments:
Post a Comment